Not only is the new 2009 list up, but there's now a listing for the 2000-2009 decade.
Call me a nerd, but I am super excited about this. Since the only decade previously complied was 1990-1999, for the first time I'll be able to compare lists. (YAYZ!!!!) But what's more, there were also some books in unexpected spots in the rankings.
This is causing me to also feel more than a wee-bit disoriented.
I was also surprised by the number of classics on the 2009 list. But it was kind of exciting to see Twilight
For the 2000-2009 decade, it probably won't surprise anyone that Harry Potter took number one. Anyone surprised, anyone?
Is anyone else out there reeling from the changes or am I alone in this?
No comments:
Post a Comment